PDA

View Full Version : June 8 and 10 Impact.


dstebbins
06-10-2007, 07:29 PM
The Impact that aired on June 8 and 10 was awesome. Harris and Storm already made up for their lackluster blindfold match at Sacrifice, so putting on that killer match on Impact was just a treat.

Skeptics, take that match, double it in length to accomodate double the airtime, and that's what every main event has the potential to give if TNA gets two hours.

Liverlips McGee
06-10-2007, 08:28 PM
Are you kidding, or are you just stupid?

dstebbins
06-10-2007, 09:55 PM
Um, no actually I was being 100% serious. That match between Harris and Storm was awesome, and if you don't agree, then why the FUCK do you even watch TNA?

Quarez
06-11-2007, 09:00 AM
Um, no actually I was being 100% serious. That match between Harris and Storm was awesome, and if you don't agree, then why the FUCK do you even watch TNA?

I actually don't believe anyone here really watch TNA...

ThoraxCrusader
06-11-2007, 10:01 AM
I must admit i watched it once.
Does that mean i am to be thrown to the dogs? i hope so

Quarez
06-11-2007, 10:08 AM
I must admit i watched it once.
Does that mean i am to be thrown to the dogs? i hope so

We don't have dogs here. They were too expensive, so we decided on a pack of midgets instead.

ThoraxCrusader
06-11-2007, 10:21 AM
We don't have dogs here. They were too expensive, so we decided on a pack of midgets instead.

Now your talking my language, as long as these midgets are wearing knee high white sports socks, that shudn't have been pulled up as far as the knees

Quarez
06-11-2007, 10:51 AM
Now your talking my language, as long as these midgets are wearing knee high white sports socks, that shudn't have been pulled up as far as the knees

Like German tourists eh?

ThoraxCrusader
06-11-2007, 01:22 PM
Just like them, after all they both enjoy sausage a bit too much

Liverlips McGee
06-12-2007, 08:12 AM
Um, no actually I was being 100% serious. That match between Harris and Storm was awesome, and if you don't agree, then why the FUCK do you even watch TNA?

First, I don't watch TNA. I catch it on occasion, but I don't watch it much, on account of it's so boring and convoluted, but I'll get to that in a minute. Second, I am not arguing the supposed greatness of this Harris-Storm match. I didn't see it, and therefore will not comment on it. Frankly, I'm not surprised they had a good match, since they actually used to be a pretty decent tag team.

What I'm saying, however, is that you seem to think that if TNA gets a second hour, you are going to see PPV caliber matches every single time out. That's just plain and simple not true. The trend of Russo-brand Crash TV, where wrestling matches are used as filler between backstage segments, will continue, and even be bolstered. Instead of having six three-minute matches, and forty minutes of other shit, they will have seven three-minute matches and ninety minutes of other shit. They seem to be getting their booking inspiration from 1999-era WCW. They don't need to worry about a second hour right now. They need to worry about making their one hour better. As far as having an allegedly good main event... even a blind squirrel finds a nut on occasion.

Slash
06-13-2007, 01:33 AM
You do have some good points, but I don't think that TNA is boring, they do hold someof their talent though, but that's for another time and that's another story.

ThoraxCrusader
06-13-2007, 12:53 PM
You do have some good points, but I don't think that TNA is boring, they do hold someof their talent though, but that's for another time and that's another story.

What does this 'holding' of their talent involve?

Slash
06-13-2007, 04:11 PM
I meant "Holding their talent back" not in the perverted way.

Liverlips McGee
06-13-2007, 08:56 PM
TNA is boring, the storylines make absolutely no sense, and they don't really try to make people care about the wrestlers. They just put two people in the ring and hope they can impress people with either flips or name value from a decade ago. Honestly, if you can't see that, I highly question your ability to follow truly good wrestling.

ThoraxCrusader
06-14-2007, 11:43 AM
I meant "Holding their talent back" not in the perverted way.

I merely asked a question, if you took what i said as an implication of perversion then you have a filthy mind young man. Wash your mouth out with soap

Big Toby Cool
06-14-2007, 03:17 PM
TNA is boring, the storylines make absolutely no sense, and they don't really try to make people care about the wrestlers. They just put two people in the ring and hope they can impress people with either flips or name value from a decade ago. Honestly, if you can't see that, I highly question your ability to follow truly good wrestling.

agreed 100%, TNA is just a spotfest.

Legend_Killa
06-15-2007, 04:15 PM
agreed 100%, TNA is just a spotfest.


Yeah, but is it better than Wrestling Society X?

Liverlips McGee
06-15-2007, 07:52 PM
WSX was absurd, and completely silly. However, if you took it simply as a live action version of the Backyard Wrestling videogames, it was mildly entertaining.

Big Toby Cool
06-16-2007, 11:43 AM
Yeah, but is it better than Wrestling Society X?

Theyre both stupid, however WSX had a certain comedy feel to it! :D